Why I Don't Like Albus Dumbledore




Since you all seemed to like last month's Harry Potter Hot Take, here's another! Again, there will potentially be Harry Potter spoilers, so continue at your own risk.

 

You’ve all read the title, so let’s get into this. My main issue with Dumbledore is that he’s manipulative and uncaring. Everything he does is for his plan, no matter how many people get hurt along the way. I know Dumbledore tends to be a fan favorite, so I’ll do my best to explain.

 

First of all, he leaves a one-year-old child on the doorstep of a family that he knows hates him, and just assumes that they’ll find and keep him. He then leaves Harry in this abusive household for ten years, and forces him to return every summer for several years afterwards. He even tells Harry’s neighbor, Arabella Figg, that she couldn’t be nice to him when he had to stay with her. His explanation was that Petunia would carry some of Lily’s maternal protection, as long as he stayed in her house each year. That doesn’t make much sense to me, as Petunia holds no maternal feelings toward Harry, nor does he view her as a maternal figure. Even so, we know that Voldemort was completely out of commission for most of that time, making the “mother’ protection” unnecessary. Furthermore, we see in The Order of the Phoenix that Dumbledore has the power to stop (or at least decrease) the Dursley’s abusive behavior. Please, let me know if you see why he didn’t do anything about it for Harry’s entire childhood, because I’m truly at a loss here.

 

Next, he sends Harry to Hogwarts and begins raising him to die. Throughout the books, Dumbledore does many questionable things that put Harry, his friends, and all the other Hogwarts students in danger, often just because he “knows Harry can handle it” or thinks it will better “prepare him for the future” (paraphrased from the books.) First, his choice in staff is very questionable. Take Argus Filch, the school caretaker, who is set on allowing violent means of punishing students. Or Quirrel, who literally had Voldemort’s face protruding out of the back of his head. And you all know my opinion on Snape already. Dumbledore knowingly allowed Snape to abuse his students for many years, so that he could “keep him close”. Dumbledore also uses his position of Headmaster to manipulate the house points. While that doesn't technically harm anyone, it is definitely a red flag indicator of his generally manipulative behavior.

 

Jumping off my last point, most of the books focus around horrible situations that Harry is put in and Dumbledore allows or causes. In The Sorcerer’s Stone, Dumbledore leaves the Mirror of Erised where he knows Harry will find it, and allows him to continue using it for quite some time, even convincing his friend to sneak out of the dorms in the middle of the night to see it. He also decides to keep a three headed dog and a series of deadly traps in the school, which doesn’t seem particularly safe for the students. Then, of course, we have a giant deadly serpent and one of Voldemort’s horcruxes injuring and almost killing multiple students. Then, there are the giant man-eating spiders in the Forbidden Forest; and the Whomping Willow, which we see destroy a car, break Ron Weasley’s wand, and injure several students later on. In The Goblet of Fire, he allows Harry to participate in the Triwizard Tournament, despite knowing that Harry is underage and did not volunteer his own name. Harry then proceeds to, once again, almost die on several occasions, ending when he’s transported to a creepy graveyard and used to resurrect Voldemort. And finally, he takes Harry to find a horcrux, almost getting both of them killed. While he did take most of the physical pain upon himself, the whole event was very traumatic to Harry. 

 

To be honest I don’t remember a lot from the last few books, but if I recall correctly, Dumbledore dies tragically in front of Harry, and they spend the rest of the time wandering around in the woods, so I think I’ve hit the major points already. Actually, let’s talk about that a bit more.

 

Another thing that Dumbledore does throughout the series is intentionally withhold crucial information, so that Harry has no choice but to do what he says. Harry is constantly chasing him, trying to ask questions and understand what’s happening and what he’s supposed to do, and Dumbledore completely ghosts him, giving evasive answers or completely disappearing. This does, of course, include Dumbledore not preparing Harry at all for his death. Dumbledore was a major father figure for Harry, and the amount of grief we see him to go through that could have been prevented is a little disturbing. Additionally, Dumbledore knew for a long time that Voldemort would have to kill Harry, and doesn’t tell him. Maybe he didn’t want to freak out a kid, but it would have been much less damaging to Harry to explain and prepare him beforehand.

 

Overall, I think it’s fair to say that Dumbledore made some pretty bad decisions, and had some twisted priorities. While he may have had good intentions and certainly viewed himself as the good guy, he harmed a lot of people along the way, in ways I just don’t think are justified. 

 

 


Comments

  1. First of all, great way of expressing your opinion. Laying down each reason that you see the character as manipulative and explaining it in detail (with examples) makes your point of view clear to the reader. However, I cannot say I agree completely. Dumbledore, as far as I can remember, was meant to be a rather mysterious character, and obviously his intentions are not always clear. Sometimes it is fine to not expose details that someone was "not ready for".
    Also, there appears to be an issue with the paragraph width in your article. Maybe check that next time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have an excellent point. I think a lot of Dumbledore's behavior allows for plot twists, climactic scenes, and excuses for character growth. I don't completely agree that he viewed himself as the good guy, though, because he clearly has his own demons and a lot of guilt towards Harry. However, Dumbledore does give off the vibe and energy of being a mastermind. It would be risky to tell Harry everything because it's just a lot to take in and not a lot of strength to take it in, so I kind of understand where he's coming from. However, Harry is constantly kept in the dark about LITERALLY EVERYTHING and there's really no reason for that. Harry could have avoided lots of mood swings, trauma, and frustration if Dumbledore had just explained everything he could. I think the best move would be to be up front about things and help guide him through it, but Dumbledore just kind of notifies Harry of something and runs off, like you said. He expresses regret for his decisions later on, but then the book offers the cheap excuse of "I loved you too much" or something along those lines. He clearly just miscalculated and caused Harry lots of pain but even his apology is laced heavy with manipulation, whether intentional or not. I get the vibe that he just lets terrible things happen to a teen so the teen matures, but somehow the teen isn't privy to information that could equip him in terrible situations that will almost certainly face. He's jammed Harry into this place between child and adult in the name of love when I think it's more about being insensitive, short sighted, and borderline negligent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I always found Dumbledore a little sketchy, but all your arguments may have pushed me to the he-is-a-bad person side. This article was well laid out, you really drove your arguments home. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ignoring the dastardly formatting, I thought this post was well presented and thought out. Your deep analysis of Dumbledore's actions had me reconsidering how I thought about him. I can't say I agree a hundred percent with this, mainly because I have thought of Dumbledore as a good guy for a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I want to start by saying that I really enjoyed this article. It illuminates an unpopular opinion, and offers some great brain-food. However, I disagree with the wholly negative assessment of Dumbledore. He has his own motivations, which I feel you don't really touch on. He is trying to fix the actions that led to Voldemort, one of his students, becoming a great dark wizard. Voldemort was able to become so corrupt by gaining too much information, too early. I think, in withholding information from Harry, Dumbledore was perhaps trying to buy him some time and isolate him from Voldemort. Dumbledore just lacked the foresight to understand that some day, he would no longer be able to protect Harry from his fate. Further, you give the man too much credit for the happenings at Hogwarts: he cannot control the beasts in the forbidden forest, nor can he control the actions of the Triwizard Cup (although he could've just not participated). I think that's all I have to say in response. Good job, the article is really thought-provoking and easy to read.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with your post (except the font color. Please change it to white or something not black.). The first few books, Dumbledore always felt like a calming presence and that when he was there everything would be fine. But as the books went on a much darker side of him was revealed. He was constantly hiding things and became a very frustrating character. I was very late to reading the Harry Potter series, so naturally most of the major plot points/deaths were already spoiled for me. But when I found out that Dumbledore had been leading Harry to his death his whole life, I was genuinely SHOCKED.
    A very well written post, I really like this series.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Books That Aren't Good or Bad

"Spy School Goes South" (Faisal)

"Spy School Secret Service" Review (Faisal)